Preparedness of Teachers for AI-Mediated Classrooms: Gaps in Skills Confidence and Ethical Issues in Teaching with AI

Authors

  • Dr. Israel Olusegun Adedeji Federal College of Education (Technical) Gusau Author
  • Dr. Abdullahi Tukur Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65921/z147v054

Keywords:

ai in education, teacher readiness, classroom technology, ai ethics

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational settings has raised new questions about teachers’ readiness to adapt to AI-mediated classrooms. This study investigated teachers’ preparedness for AI-assisted teaching and the effect of AI-related skills gaps, professional confidence, and ethical concerns. A cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data were collected from 296 secondary school teachers in Gusau metropolis Zamfara State Nigeria, from a population of 1,800 teachers. The study employed both Descriptive and multiple regression analyses. Teachers reported a high level of confidence and preparedness in teaching. Yet, the teachers faced significant gaps in AI-related skills and showed ethical concerns. Professional confidence was the strongest predictor of preparedness (β = 0.41, p < .001). On the other hand, skills gaps (β = −0.29, p < .001) and ethical concerns (β = −0.18, p < .001) were found to have constraining effects. The findings imply that the gaps in AI-mediated classrooms suggest the need for the teacher to have multidimensional attributes that include knowledge, confidence, and ethics. The research adds to the ongoing discussions of the ethical integration of AI in education and the need for professional growth and policy guidelines that combine the pedagogy and the ethics of using AI in education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Dr. Israel Olusegun Adedeji, Federal College of Education (Technical) Gusau

    Department of Educational Foundations, School of Education

    Chief Lecturer

  • Dr. Abdullahi Tukur

    Department of Educational Foundations, School of Education, 

    Principal Lecturer

References

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 2575–2594.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Boateng, R., Essel, H. B., & Badu-Nyarko, S. K. (2023). Digital transformation in education in developing contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3471–3490.

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229249

Gómez, F. C., Jr. (2021). Exploring teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy as a predictor of classroom technology use. Frontiers in Education.

Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., & Burden, K. (2025). The ethics of using AI in K-12 education: a systematic literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601

Granström M and Oppi P (2025) Assessing teachers’ readiness and perceived usefulness of AI in education: an Estonian perspective. Frontier Education 10:1622240. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1622240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1622240

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: A bibliometric study. Education Sciences, 12(2), 111.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kimmons, R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Allman, B. (2021). Trends in educational technology research. Computers & Education, 170, 104222.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610

OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities. OECD Publishing.

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Viveros, B. S. (2021). A meta-analysis of teachers’ technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 165, 104146.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Tan, X., Cheng,G., & Ling,M. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 8,2025, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). Teacher educators as gatekeepers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 555–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Brown, S. (2022). Teaching with AI. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103647

U.S. Department of Education and Office of Educational Technology (2023) Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. Washington DC. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance on generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads in AI and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Published

15-09-2026

Data Availability Statement

All data are available (Questionnaire, Consent form and Ethical Approval Letters) and can be obtained from the authors

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Adedeji, I., & Tukur, A. (2026). Preparedness of Teachers for AI-Mediated Classrooms: Gaps in Skills Confidence and Ethical Issues in Teaching with AI. Academos Journal, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.65921/z147v054