Digital Linguistic Capital and Educational Inclusion: The Case of Generative AI in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65921/w93afz23Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, digital linguistic capital, linguistic inequality, bangladesh, ai ethics, bangladesh educationAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly influencing educational practices by providing opportunities for personalized learning, knowledge accessibility, and multilingual communication. However, the educational consequences of AI are shaped by existing social, linguistic, and technological inequalities. This article examines how generative AI may influence language-based educational inequality in Bangladesh, where Bangla represents national identity and cultural recognition, while English continues to function as a dominant language of academic advancement, employment, and global mobility. Through an integrative literature review of research on linguistic capital, postcolonial language hierarchy, digital inequality, AI ethics, and educational technology, this study analyses both the transformative possibilities and potential risks of GenAI in the Bangladeshi education system. The review identifies that AI tools can support Bangla-speaking learners through multilingual explanation, translation, writing assistance, and access to previously inaccessible knowledge resources. However, unequal access to digital infrastructure, limited Bangla-language AI resources, commercial inequalities, algorithmic bias, hallucination, and privacy concerns may reinforce existing educational disparities. To address this challenge, the article introduces the concept of Digital Linguistic Capital, defined as the ability to use AI technologies for multilingual knowledge access, translation, evaluation, production, and critical engagement. The article proposes a four-pillar governance framework based on inclusion, linguistic justice, accountability, and capacity building. The study argues that generative AI should not be viewed only as a technological innovation but as a social and educational intervention requiring ethical governance to ensure equitable linguistic participation.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Sage.
Chaudhury, R. (2011). English-Bengali divide and educational inequality in Bangladesh. South Asian Education Review, 14(3), 89-104.
Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.
Hamid, M. O., & Baldauf, R. B. (2014). English and socio-economic disadvantage: Learner voices from rural Bangladesh. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 201-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.573687
Hamid, M. O., & Honan, E. (2012). Communicative English in the primary classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 139-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.678854
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Rahman, T. (2005). English in Bangladesh: Colonial legacy or postcolonial necessity? World Englishes, 24(4), 451-467.
Sarkar, P. (2022). AI and the democratization of language in South Asia. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(5), 401-418.
UNESCO. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities in South Asia. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tanjina Jahan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Academos Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license allows others to share, copy, distribute, and adapt the work for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited.
Authors retain copyright of their articles, and full publishing rights are granted to the journal.


